In the previous blog, my group had to peer review another group's draft of their film. After writing that blog, we received our reviews from other peers. This occurred to allow us to re-shoot and re-edit what we might have missed. We were reviewed by two different groups. From what I saw, our most common flaw was not having all of out titles or the audience didn't understand what was happening. For the titles, we had some miscommunication among our group. I did the first half and another group member volunteered to do the others but they weren't in the final copy. However, the titles that we did have were in order. We also came to the conclusion that the audience didn't fully understand our movie because not all of our scenes were included. Some scenes had to be cut in order for the film to make any sense at all because we weren't able to film all the scenes in our storyboard. Although our peers disliked these aspects, there were some qualities that they enjoyed. One group said that the fake crying in the movie was great.The other group managed to understand the film and commented on the complexity of it. Both group recommended that our dialogue be louder or to have voice-overs throughout the two minutes. The groups also commented on what camera angles and movements and editing tactics we used. Both groups had different responses to the questions about it so we need to go back and make each one more clear. In all, our group needs to work on this film A LOT. In order to prepare it for grading, it must be perfect. We fully intend, sometime this week or next, to re-shoot our scenes that need it and re-edit existing scenes along with the new ones. The pictures below are from one of the groups that peer reviewed us.
No comments:
Post a Comment